My apologies, I thought it would capture as a PDF. I'll try and PM you the score!OCTO wrote:From a PDF I could estimate better, the picture is hard to zoom at the high level. I guess it is Finale (of course, customized).
Software recognition, by eye
Re: Software recognition, by eye
"Take an object. Do something to it. Do something else to it." - Jasper Johns
Software recognition, by eye
Looks like Finale to me. There are a lot of things that indicate so (treble/bass cords, etc.), but the system brackets and grand staff brace is a dead giveaway.
Music Typeface Designer & Engraver - LilyPond | Sibelius | Finale | MuseScore | Dorico | SMuFL | Inkscape | FontForge
Re: Software recognition, by eye
Cheers! I did zoom right into the clefs and braces of this score and also of a score that I knew was engraved in Finale, and they seemed pretty much identical! The publisher for this one is Schott, I've noticed that some of their older scores were typeset in Finale, but some of their newer ones or smaller chamber things were done in Sibelius. Do any publishers still use programs like SCORE?tisimst wrote:Looks like Finale to me. There are a lot of things that indicate so (treble/bass cords, etc.), but the system brackets and grand staff brace is a dead giveaway.
"Take an object. Do something to it. Do something else to it." - Jasper Johns
Software recognition, by eye
I've always wondered the same thing. I know Henle does, but not sure about others. I've seen scores from Bärenreiter that have the SCORE appearance, but I believe they just use a similar music typeface. I could be wrong, though.
Music Typeface Designer & Engraver - LilyPond | Sibelius | Finale | MuseScore | Dorico | SMuFL | Inkscape | FontForge
Re: Software recognition, by eye
Our friend Wess works for Schott - you might ask him for some insider info.T Earl wrote:Cheers! I did zoom right into the clefs and braces of this score and also of a score that I knew was engraved in Finale, and they seemed pretty much identical! The publisher for this one is Schott, I've noticed that some of their older scores were typeset in Finale, but some of their newer ones or smaller chamber things were done in Sibelius. Do any publishers still use programs like SCORE?tisimst wrote:Looks like Finale to me. There are a lot of things that indicate so (treble/bass cords, etc.), but the system brackets and grand staff brace is a dead giveaway.
Freelance Composer. Self-Publisher.
Finale 27.5 • Sibelius 2024.3• MuseScore 4+ • Logic Pro X+ • Ableton Live 11+ • Digital Performer 11 /// MacOS Monterey (secondary in use systems: Fedora 35, Windows 10)
Finale 27.5 • Sibelius 2024.3• MuseScore 4+ • Logic Pro X+ • Ableton Live 11+ • Digital Performer 11 /// MacOS Monterey (secondary in use systems: Fedora 35, Windows 10)
Re: Software recognition, by eye
Thank you for the heads-up! I'll drop him a lineOCTO wrote:Our friend Wess works for Schott - you might ask him for some insider info.T Earl wrote:Cheers! I did zoom right into the clefs and braces of this score and also of a score that I knew was engraved in Finale, and they seemed pretty much identical! The publisher for this one is Schott, I've noticed that some of their older scores were typeset in Finale, but some of their newer ones or smaller chamber things were done in Sibelius. Do any publishers still use programs like SCORE?tisimst wrote:Looks like Finale to me. There are a lot of things that indicate so (treble/bass cords, etc.), but the system brackets and grand staff brace is a dead giveaway.
"Take an object. Do something to it. Do something else to it." - Jasper Johns
Re: Software recognition, by eye
Wish I could’ve seen this earlier and shown off how I recognized that the music font is clearly Maestro, and the curly braces on the Harp are definitely Finale. You guys are great.
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: 17 Jun 2016, 10:00
Re: Software recognition, by eye
Schott used SCORE plenty years ago (they promoted it and gave it to their external engravers).
They moved to finale being concerned about the stalled development of score.
They moved to Sibelius driven crazy by incompatibilities between finale versions.
But the new Mahler edition is done in the old Score, because that's the one, they are trusting in, not the followers.
They moved to finale being concerned about the stalled development of score.
They moved to Sibelius driven crazy by incompatibilities between finale versions.
But the new Mahler edition is done in the old Score, because that's the one, they are trusting in, not the followers.
Software Developer, Musician and Engraving Aficionado
PriMus 1.1
PriMus 1.1
Re: Software recognition, by eye
Alright folks, another one for you sharp-eyed engravers.
Because this was engraved in c.1998 by Schott, am I right, due to the previous comments, to presume this is a Finale job again?
Cheers!
Because this was engraved in c.1998 by Schott, am I right, due to the previous comments, to presume this is a Finale job again?
Cheers!
- Attachments
-
- Screen Shot 2016-11-22 at 14.20.20.png (203.84 KiB) Viewed 12204 times
-
- Screen Shot 2016-11-22 at 14.19.57.png (188.09 KiB) Viewed 12204 times
"Take an object. Do something to it. Do something else to it." - Jasper Johns
Re: Software recognition, by eye
This doesn't look like Finale. Anyone?
Freelance Composer. Self-Publisher.
Finale 27.5 • Sibelius 2024.3• MuseScore 4+ • Logic Pro X+ • Ableton Live 11+ • Digital Performer 11 /// MacOS Monterey (secondary in use systems: Fedora 35, Windows 10)
Finale 27.5 • Sibelius 2024.3• MuseScore 4+ • Logic Pro X+ • Ableton Live 11+ • Digital Performer 11 /// MacOS Monterey (secondary in use systems: Fedora 35, Windows 10)