Search found 428 matches
- 10 Sep 2026, 04:39
- Forum: Digital Notation Tools
- Topic: Lilypond users?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 162
Re: Lilypond users?
I used to use it quite a lot for engraving a mix of choral, piano, and solo works. I’ve had less frequent opportunity recently. Still my go-to software of choice though when I really want to control things. If I need to pound something out quickly and don’t care how it looks, I will use MuseScore ...
- 07 Jun 2026, 14:39
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: What’s wrong with the Leland Font in MuseScore?
- Replies: 25
- Views: 3641
Re: What’s wrong with the Leland Font in MuseScore?
Just out of curiosity, for the symbols you dislike in these other fonts, do you have genuine SCORE specimens that show the same symbols more favorably?
- 09 Feb 2026, 21:01
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: Text height with respect to staff space standards
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1662
Re: Text height with respect to staff space standards
I’ve found that it’s more about x-height (or lower case letter height) than capital letter height. The value that always looks the most cohesive to me is an x-height around 1-staff space. There’s definitely some wiggle room there, a bit more (larger font size) still works well, a bit less (smaller ...
- 26 Jan 2026, 19:58
- Forum: Type and Font Design
- Topic: SMuFL Advance Width in Dorico
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2214
Re: SMuFL Advance Width in Dorico
If you’re using Glyphs, then you might be interested in the scripts already created for it, found on GitHub. I never used Glyphs when I did my MTF work, so I can’t vouch for them, but they might be enough to get you what you need.
https://www.github.com/steinbergmedia/smufl
https://www.github.com/steinbergmedia/smufl
- 26 Jan 2026, 18:17
- Forum: Type and Font Design
- Topic: SMuFL Advance Width in Dorico
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2214
Re: SMuFL Advance Width in Dorico
I’m digging from my memory, but I believe Dorico mostly only uses the glyph’s bounding boxes directly from the font and not even from the json file. When Daniel Spreadbury was coming up with SMuFL, he was envisioning how programs *might* access the data and therefore provided a few different options ...
- 21 Sep 2025, 17:19
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: question about a pick-up in choral writing
- Replies: 1
- Views: 5142
Re: question about a pick-up in choral writing
In my experience, there are usually only two scenarios where I would split a choral bar like you want to do:
1. At the very beginning (a pickup measure)
2. In a hymnal (to show consistent phrasing from system to system)
Outside of that, I do not recommend splitting it up. Leave the measures intact ...
1. At the very beginning (a pickup measure)
2. In a hymnal (to show consistent phrasing from system to system)
Outside of that, I do not recommend splitting it up. Leave the measures intact ...
- 17 May 2025, 20:11
- Forum: Type and Font Design
- Topic: Splentino - by benwiggy
- Replies: 8
- Views: 92947
Re: Splentino - by benwiggy
Great work, Ben! Looks like a wonderful addition for the industry.
- 07 May 2024, 22:28
- Forum: Engraving Commentaries
- Topic: Opposing Seconds with dots
- Replies: 11
- Views: 105002
Re: Opposing Seconds with dots
With two voices, I would never interpret that as a staccato (since it should always be pushed outside to the stem), but someone might. That’s a tough one. Might be best to push the dot just a hair to the right to give it that extra clarity without moving it too far from the notehead it goes with.
- 28 Apr 2024, 13:13
- Forum: Engraving Commentaries
- Topic: Opposing Seconds with dots
- Replies: 11
- Views: 105002
Re: Opposing Seconds with dots
Completely agree, benwiggy.
- 17 Apr 2024, 02:01
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: An age old engraving problem
- Replies: 6
- Views: 19783
Re: An age old engraving problem
And here's a post I did on a separate topic that is related to your query:
viewtopic.php?p=10221#p10221
viewtopic.php?p=10221#p10221