Breaking beam

Discuss the rules of notation, standard notation practices, efficient notation practices and graphic design.
Post Reply
Hector Pascal
Posts: 94
Joined: 17 Oct 2021, 23:15

Breaking beam

Post by Hector Pascal »

Hi All,
Which beaming is the more preferable: Example A or B?
Screen Shot 2023-05-19 at 12.01.52 pm.png
Screen Shot 2023-05-19 at 12.01.52 pm.png (1002.43 KiB) Viewed 1186 times
Many thanks! Hope you are all having a good day / night :)
HP.
benwiggy
Posts: 850
Joined: 11 Apr 2016, 19:42

Re: Breaking beam

Post by benwiggy »

A seems understandable, and much more familiar. You don't need to show the sub-beats.

The slur is a bit wild, though...!
User avatar
David Ward
Posts: 527
Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 19:50
Location: Aberdeenshire, Scotland
Contact:

Re: Breaking beam

Post by David Ward »

I think I might actually go for B, but it would depend on the circumstances. What instrument is this for? What in this context is implied by the tenuto articulation? The tempo, the general character of the music, the rhythmic patterns elsewhere &c &c &c might all influence the choice.
Finale 25.5 & F 26.3.1
Mac OS 10.13.6 & 10.14.6
https://composers-uk.com/davidward/news-links/
Hector Pascal
Posts: 94
Joined: 17 Oct 2021, 23:15

Re: Breaking beam

Post by Hector Pascal »

Thank you so much for the replies! They were helpful! Sorry about not giving a context to the question... It was for sax. The tempo is slow. Also the tenuto is intended to indicate a note that is soft-tongued. I am thinking I'll go with example A. I have another very tricky beaming question but I'll post it tomorrow :) Thank you again!
HP
Post Reply