We're in 9/8. This bar has 8 demisemiquavers (32nds?) in the time of 12; but the tuplet is marked "3".
.
Surely it should be 2, or 4, or 8...?Tuplet values
Re: Tuplet values
Perhaps the 3 was a misreading of a badly drawn 8 in the manuscript....?
-
- Posts: 299
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017, 16:36
- Location: Sweden
Re: Tuplet values
Doesn't it look more like a badly placed 2? (Left bottom "corner".)
Badly placed or perhaps a little too small.
Badly placed or perhaps a little too small.
Finale 26, 27 on Windows 10
Re: Tuplet values
You could be right; the quality of both original the print and the scan make it hard to determine. But when I zoom in, it could be a 2 after all.
Ah yes, there are other instances of the same pattern where it's clearly a 2. Stand down.
Ah yes, there are other instances of the same pattern where it's clearly a 2. Stand down.
-
- Posts: 299
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017, 16:36
- Location: Sweden
Re: Tuplet values
Another question about your first example. Now and then I get older manuscripts to work with, where composers obviously use slurs instead of brackets for tuplets, in the old way. Sometimes they are broken, sometimes not. When not, the slurs are not always that obvious: are they just "tuplet slurs", or legato slurs as well?
Any ideas about this?
Edit: Quite possibly this has been discussed before. But in which thread?
Any ideas about this?
Edit: Quite possibly this has been discussed before. But in which thread?
Finale 26, 27 on Windows 10
Re: Tuplet values
I would agree. Seems to be "2".Anders Hedelin wrote: ↑01 Dec 2023, 09:25 Doesn't it look more like a badly placed 2? (Left bottom "corner".)
Badly placed or perhaps a little too small.
Freelance Composer. Self-Publisher.
Finale 27.5 • Sibelius 2024.3• MuseScore 4+ • Logic Pro X+ • Ableton Live 11+ • Digital Performer 11 /// MacOS Monterey (secondary in use systems: Fedora 35, Windows 10)
Finale 27.5 • Sibelius 2024.3• MuseScore 4+ • Logic Pro X+ • Ableton Live 11+ • Digital Performer 11 /// MacOS Monterey (secondary in use systems: Fedora 35, Windows 10)
-
- Posts: 2686
- Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 14:25
- Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Re: Tuplet values
Pretty sure they are 2s.
To me, tuplet brackets look out of place in older music, being too angular. I'd engrave it as it stands. And then there is the ambiguity:
To me, tuplet brackets look out of place in older music, being too angular. I'd engrave it as it stands. And then there is the ambiguity:
The slur often did double duty as a bracket and a slur. Context often makes clear what was intended. In other cases, we'll never know for sure, so I think it is better to leave it as it is.Anders Hedelin wrote: ↑01 Dec 2023, 12:25 Another question about your first example. Now and then I get older manuscripts to work with, where composers obviously use slurs instead of brackets for tuplets, in the old way. Sometimes they are broken, sometimes not. When not, the slurs are not always that obvious: are they just "tuplet slurs", or legato slurs as well?
Any ideas about this?
M1 Mac mini (OS 12.4), Dorico 5, Finale 25.5, GPO 4, Affinity Publisher 2, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard maestro
Re: Tuplet values
Sadly not all softwares allow for creation of slur-like tuplet brackets.John Ruggero wrote: ↑02 Dec 2023, 02:59 The slur often did double duty as a bracket and a slur. Context often makes clear what was intended. In other cases, we'll never know for sure, so I think it is better to leave it as it is.