D.C. vs double-bar repeat

For those who need help with notation issues. (Please use the other available forums for help with software issues.)
Post Reply
pfata
Posts: 2
Joined: 01 Jun 2023, 14:45

D.C. vs double-bar repeat

Post by pfata »

Hello, everyone! I would like to ask for opinions on best practices for notating repeats. I am engraving a set of hymn-like songs that have several verses and repeat whole, from the beginning. I always use a simple double-bar repeat at the end to send the reader back to the beginning. The composer does not like this, and wants instead D.C. I don’t really like D.C. without “al fine” or “al coda.” Am I missing something?
Thank you in advance!
User avatar
OCTO
Posts: 1776
Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 06:52
Location: Sweden

Re: D.C. vs double-bar repeat

Post by OCTO »

D.C. simply means "from the head," and nothing extra is needed, if you don't like it.

However, try to imagine writing a computer program in Lisp or Python. What happens when you start from D.C.?  When does it ultimately end, or where does it finish?  Without a specified ending, your program would enter into an infinite loop, which could lead to a either crash or require a brute "kill"-function, in both cases an unpleasant execution.
Freelance Composer. Self-Publisher.
Finale 27.5 • Sibelius 2024.3• MuseScore 4+ • Logic Pro X+ • Ableton Live 11+ • Digital Performer 11 /// MacOS Monterey (secondary in use systems: Fedora 35, Windows 10)
User avatar
John Ruggero
Posts: 2515
Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 14:25
Location: Raleigh, NC USA

Re: D.C. vs double-bar repeat

Post by John Ruggero »

I'm with you, pfata. The current practice is to use repeat marks, even if the piece has only one repeated section.

Using a D. C. is quite an old-fashioned way of handling this. But if the composer really wants it, I guess you must bow to his wishes.

As OCTO mentioned a D. C. could even lead to misunderstanding.

Schumann Papillons op. 2 no. 2 is for me such an example. In this case, many pianists repeat the entire piece. But is it really musically satisfactory to repeat the initial 4 measure introduction? And note the final 16th rest. The meter only adds up if the D. C starts with the pickup to measure 5. I would say that Schumann has omitted a necessary segno. Better that he had used repeat marks as he does throughout the rest of the piece. Papillons is a collection of odds and end that he put together later, so perhaps the D. C. is vestigial.
Schumann op 2.png
Schumann op 2.png (475.98 KiB) Viewed 998 times
M1 Mac mini (OS 12.4), Dorico, Finale 25.5, GPO 4, Affinity Publisher 2, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard maestro

http://www.cantilenapress.com
Post Reply