John Ruggero wrote:The celeste additions in Ondine give it the J. Williams touch, Knut. Don't you like Star Wars?
Star Wars is fun, but I'm not John Williams biggest fan. Actually, my favorite score of his is for the movie Catch Me If You Can, a jazz oriented, pretty atypical Williams score. His influence on the orchestral film music since the 1970s is hard to argue with, though.
John Ruggero wrote:But seriously, I agree with all of your comments: harp harmonics would be lovely for the solo, somewhat like those in the 1st movement of the Ravel Piano Concerto. The Peters edition terminates the pedal editorially on the first note of that solo. The first edition has the termination a little after beat 3 of the previous measure as if silence were to ensue before the solo and as in the orchestration. I have always preferred some sort of resonance behind the solo, achieved by lifting the pedal gradually through the 1/4-rest before the solo, but leaving it slightly depressed so that the felt is barely in contact with the strings through the solo. Perhaps this could be achieved orchestrally with a few strings sustaining a D minor triad almost inaudibly behind the solo.
That's more or less exactly what I was thinking of! Louis Lortie's rendition (on Chandos) utilizes this to great effect, I think.
Ravel was very adamant about the sparse use of sustain pedal, typical for the french piano tradition. This is confirmed in Vlado Perlmutter's memoir
According to Ravel, which feature the composer's own comments on performing his solo piano music. Half pedal seems to be something Ravel insisted on in several cases, to keep the music sufficiently dry, while at the same time retaining some smoothness. In his orchestrations, it is also clear that while Ravel uses dovetailing very frequently, it is always very sparse and transparent. With this in mind, Constant clearly goes overboard with his background on several points, at least if his purpose is to give the arrangement 'authentic' feeling.
John Ruggero wrote:The orchestral version of the measure that started this thread would be very different from the original, but some sort of written ritardando effect seems in order. I don't care for what happens in the arrangement in that the accompaniment is indistinct, especially on the third part of the RH triplet.
I agree that this, as well as the ascending run, sounds a bit too much like an afterthought in Constant's arrangement. Perhaps it is appropriate to write the lines out for woodwinds or strings, in a similar fashion to what OCTO did above, to get lines substantial enough, but I think including the harp is very appropriate as well.