Page 2 of 2
Re: Attribution and Use of Sources
Posted: 05 May 2024, 11:44
by Harpsichordmaker
benwiggy wrote: ↑04 May 2024, 15:33
From what I understand, they still have all their data, but they don't want to simply "restore the backup and carry on" -- because those systems would have the same vulnerabilities. It's going to take time to migrate their data to new systems.
I wholeheartedly hope so. However, their report says they have located “viable sources of unaffected backups… from which data
could be recovered.” (page 9)
And:
“Digital collections, […] through backups and/or third party copies… though full validation will only be possible once each dataset is checked.” (page 10)
From:
https://www.bl.uk/home/british-library- ... h-2024.pdf
Of course they are sensibly using a lot of caution in their public communications, this may be the reason why their wording doesn’t seem fully reassuring. However even a partial restore of digital collections will be welcome. Finger crossed.
Re: Attribution and Use of Sources
Posted: 05 May 2024, 18:07
by benwiggy
They still have the paper originals, at least!
Re: Attribution and Use of Sources
Posted: 09 May 2024, 22:16
by OCTO
benwiggy wrote: ↑02 May 2024, 12:54
It's probably worth mentioning that a lot of libraries will have received some sort of government funding for digital scanning programmes, which will make public access a condition. (EU cultural funding, particularly.)
We do live in an extraordinary age, where I can sit in my chair and browse through manuscripts from Vienna, Naples, Paris, London, etc. (In fact, as I type this, I have a set of 17th-century part books from Cambridge University displaying in another window....)
Yes, special times indeed. While you are browsing a score in Vienna you can post to the notat.io forum for us to read worldwide!
