Which do members of this forum prefer?
Although 3 is probably quite normal, I prefer to avoid that kind of tuplet. Routinely, I notate potential duplets and quadruplets in 6/8, 9/8, 12/8 &c as dotted notes rather than as tuplets. For this reason, my initial choice here in 3/4 was 1, but I've since revised it to 2 as being more correct if a tad fussy.
Or indeed, maybe 4 is the most ‘correct’, but again, I would probably rather avoid that one, although I don't dislike it as much as I do 3.
Any comments?
Preferred notation?
- David Ward
- Posts: 559
- Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 19:50
- Location: Aberdeenshire, Scotland
- Contact:
Preferred notation?
- Attachments
-
- Screenshot 2021-05-20 at 15.27.54 copy.jpg (139.04 KiB) Viewed 2165 times
-
- Screenshot 2021-05-20 at 15.45.24 copy.jpg (57.97 KiB) Viewed 2165 times
Finale 26.3.1 & 27.4 Dorico 5.1.81 waiting but not yet in use
Mac 11.7.10 & 15.4.1
https://composers-uk.com/davidward/news-links/
Mac 11.7.10 & 15.4.1
https://composers-uk.com/davidward/news-links/
-
- Posts: 299
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017, 16:36
- Location: Sweden
Re: Preferred notation?
FWIW I prefer No. 1, which should be easy enough to understand - four equal note values in a measure of three quarters. For reference this kind of dotted values is quite common in Bartók's notation. Personally I think No. 2 would be more relevant in a slower tempo than
= 120.

Finale 26, 27 on Windows 10