Search found 321 matches
- 26 Apr 2025, 13:39
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: Rests in 5/4
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3166
Re: Rests in 5/4
No, I meant in 5/4, since we were discussing about 4+1.
- 26 Apr 2025, 13:21
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: Rests in 5/4
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3166
Re: Rests in 5/4
Very interesting. So, would he write it as a half-rest + two quarters (or opposite)?
- 26 Apr 2025, 12:17
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: Rests in 5/4
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3166
Re: Rests in 5/4
Yes, they would.
At least, they insisted on that when I tried to convince them to use a 3+2 or 2+3.
At least, they insisted on that when I tried to convince them to use a 3+2 or 2+3.
- 26 Apr 2025, 11:44
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: Rests in 5/4
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3166
Re: Rests in 5/4
Several modern (living) composer consider 1+4 and 4+1 as plausible subdivisions of 5/4. When I was studying "advanced solfege" (!) in Switzerland, using the now almost defunct French method of the CNSMP, we were taught that 5/8, 7/8, 10/8, and 11/8 (and smaller /16, /32 ...) are irregular ...
- 18 Apr 2025, 16:45
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: About "half" indications for string sections
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1771
Re: About "half" indications for string sections
If you use the Italian marking, make sure you include the grave accent on the last a: metà.
- 11 Apr 2025, 06:53
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: Double Common Time Signature
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4684
Re: Double Common Time Signature
I think that you are right about a possible ghosting: the manuscript has a very big C while a few numbers later there is an also quite big cut C. Dotzauer was not new to writing a possibly cut-C music in ordinary C. This was his op. 65 (1824-26) when he was 41-3 years old. It is my assumption that h...
- 11 Apr 2025, 06:50
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: A Question of Hearing and Notation in Beethoven
- Replies: 17
- Views: 17536
Re: A Question of Hearing and Notation in Beethoven
Thanks, Neera. Given the context, that staccato looks like an error to me, and I myself would play a slurred two-note group like the rest. The piece is nicely engraved, but I see a substantial error in m. 7 of your second example, so inaccuracy is not out of the question. You are correct, John. A c...
- 10 Apr 2025, 14:29
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: A Question of Hearing and Notation in Beethoven
- Replies: 17
- Views: 17536
Re: A Question of Hearing and Notation in Beethoven
Let's try with this, it is on a page turn:
- 10 Apr 2025, 14:27
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: Double Common Time Signature
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4684
Re: Double Common Time Signature
Hi John!
it's in the Books category because, in theory, it has no opus number.
The autograph should be the top one: https://imslp.org/wiki/Metodo_per_Violo ... Friedrich)
it's in the Books category because, in theory, it has no opus number.
The autograph should be the top one: https://imslp.org/wiki/Metodo_per_Violo ... Friedrich)
- 10 Apr 2025, 07:20
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: A Question of Hearing and Notation in Beethoven
- Replies: 17
- Views: 17536
Re: A Question of Hearing and Notation in Beethoven
As a cellist who, at least in his times, got very little harmony training until it was too late to really matter—that was the way of the Italian education system—I got used to deduce harmonic function based on melodies. There are certainly many more possibilities compared to when harmonising a bass ...