Search found 353 matches
- 31 Jul 2025, 19:24
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: Modern convention on this cello passage
- Replies: 23
- Views: 14743
Re: Modern convention on this cello passage
Ahahah! I didn't know that but I can definitely imagine him really doing that!
- 22 Jul 2025, 15:51
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: Chopin Impromptu in C# minor Op. 66 and cautionary accidentals
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3472
Re: Chopin Impromptu in C# minor Op. 66 and cautionary accidentals
Wow, John!
This is amazing!
Thank you for this great analysis, and congratulations!
This is amazing!
Thank you for this great analysis, and congratulations!
- 21 Jul 2025, 16:15
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: Chopin Impromptu in C# minor Op. 66 and cautionary accidentals
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3472
Re: Chopin Impromptu in C# minor Op. 66 and cautionary accidentals
Ah ok! Great!
I thought the autograph (A) was the first version, with two copies of it as C1 and C2.
Thank you for clarifying!
I thought the autograph (A) was the first version, with two copies of it as C1 and C2.
Thank you for clarifying!
- 21 Jul 2025, 15:58
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: Chopin Impromptu in C# minor Op. 66 and cautionary accidentals
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3472
Re: Chopin Impromptu in C# minor Op. 66 and cautionary accidentals
I played a bit with the website and it is indeed amazing. I will purchase the Henle version, then, since I believe none of the sources on the website include the second version. Now, if that version was discovered in 1962 and somehow registered, it would still be under copyright. But is it still a c...
- 21 Jul 2025, 14:54
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: Impossible violin harmonic?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 3854
Re: Impossible violin harmonic?
I would certainly not protest to MichelRE option were I to find it on my stand! 

- 21 Jul 2025, 14:47
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: Chopin Impromptu in C# minor Op. 66 and cautionary accidentals
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3472
Re: Chopin Impromptu in C# minor Op. 66 and cautionary accidentals
Thank you John! If I understood correctly, you would suggest following a good modern edition which has fewer accidentals. Sadly Wiener Urtext is not available digitally and I can't find it on nkoda. Shipping would cost more than the edition itself at the moment. I was not aware of the existence of t...
- 21 Jul 2025, 14:21
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: Impossible violin harmonic?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 3854
Re: Impossible violin harmonic?
The second diamond (G) is not necessary and could puzzle some players as they may be induced to play the G on the D string, even just accidentally.
- 21 Jul 2025, 07:01
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: Chopin Impromptu in C# minor Op. 66 and cautionary accidentals
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3472
Chopin Impromptu in C# minor Op. 66 and cautionary accidentals
Dear all, I have been tasked with re-engraving Chopin's most famous Impromptu in C# minor, Op. 66 (actually posthumous). After completing the note-copying I couldn't help but notice something: every published edition I could find uses very few cautionary accidentals compared to what Dorico does with...
- 21 Jul 2025, 06:51
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: Impossible violin harmonic?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 3854
Re: Impossible violin harmonic?
I actually like the new convention proposed by Gould where every natural harmonic between the nut and the half of the string (excluded) should be written with a diamond notehead and nothing else, meaning to touch that exact point on the string without any other interference. As MichelRE said, the D4...
- 20 Jul 2025, 20:39
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: Modern convention on this cello passage
- Replies: 23
- Views: 14743
Re: Modern convention on this cello passage
There is a nice joke about the cello and Verdi.
« What does Verdi write when wanting the cellos to play F? »
« PPP espressivo »

« What does Verdi write when wanting the cellos to play F? »
« PPP espressivo »
