Very Short Octave Sign Rant
-
- Posts: 2677
- Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 14:25
- Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Very Short Octave Sign Rant
What is wrong with this picture?
Finale Default: Example octave signs from piano music by Wiener Urtext, Henle, Peters, Schlesinger, Schirmer, Associated Board and my unfavorite, Durand: And are the default octave signs any better in any of the other notation software?
Finale Default: Example octave signs from piano music by Wiener Urtext, Henle, Peters, Schlesinger, Schirmer, Associated Board and my unfavorite, Durand: And are the default octave signs any better in any of the other notation software?
M1 Mac mini (OS 12.4), Dorico 5, Finale 25.5, GPO 4, Affinity Publisher 2, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard maestro
-
- Posts: 255
- Joined: 03 Feb 2017, 02:25
- Location: Toronto
Re: Very Short Octave Sign Rant
The larger, more widely spaced dashes are more bothersome to me than the redundant va.
Re: Very Short Octave Sign Rant
Finale’s right edge is too short.
LilyPond 2.19.83 default: IMO the full-size “va” looks very bad but the right edge looks cleaner than the dashed ones (especially Durand).
MuseScore 3.2.3 default: Too small gaps between the dashes.
LilyPond 2.19.83 default: IMO the full-size “va” looks very bad but the right edge looks cleaner than the dashed ones (especially Durand).
MuseScore 3.2.3 default: Too small gaps between the dashes.
Re: Very Short Octave Sign Rant
You can get pretty close by changing three engraving options and saving them as default in Dorico:
For what it’s worth, I hardly ever used Finale’s built-in octave lines. I had my own.
Unfortunately, it’s still impossible to get the vertical position of the line right. Oh well...For what it’s worth, I hardly ever used Finale’s built-in octave lines. I had my own.
Re: Very Short Octave Sign Rant
Agree, I use also my own.
Freelance Composer. Self-Publisher.
Finale 27.5 • Sibelius 2024.3• MuseScore 4+ • Logic Pro X+ • Ableton Live 11+ • Digital Performer 11 /// MacOS Monterey (secondary in use systems: Fedora 35, Windows 10)
Finale 27.5 • Sibelius 2024.3• MuseScore 4+ • Logic Pro X+ • Ableton Live 11+ • Digital Performer 11 /// MacOS Monterey (secondary in use systems: Fedora 35, Windows 10)
-
- Posts: 2677
- Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 14:25
- Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Re: Very Short Octave Sign Rant
Florian, the Dorico is excellent and has a nice vertical, but what does the default look like? The point of the thread is that the defaults, as kindly shown above by MaiteM and the comments by Schonbergian and OCTO. make one wonder if the designers ever looked at engraved music when it comes to octave signs. And examples at the Dorico forum make me wonder about Dorico as well.
I too use my own but am considering modifying it to look more dotted and less dashed. I like a lowish attachment point as shown and sorry to hear that it can't be done in Dorico. I think I now prefer the dashed vertical and will definitely change that if it is possible in Finale. The va is anathema to me, as is the 8vb business that seems to have provoked the recent resurgence of the va. Suggestions are welcome:
I too use my own but am considering modifying it to look more dotted and less dashed. I like a lowish attachment point as shown and sorry to hear that it can't be done in Dorico. I think I now prefer the dashed vertical and will definitely change that if it is possible in Finale. The va is anathema to me, as is the 8vb business that seems to have provoked the recent resurgence of the va. Suggestions are welcome:
M1 Mac mini (OS 12.4), Dorico 5, Finale 25.5, GPO 4, Affinity Publisher 2, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard maestro
-
- Posts: 255
- Joined: 03 Feb 2017, 02:25
- Location: Toronto
Re: Very Short Octave Sign Rant
MuseScore's default is definitely the best, but I think I still prefer John's overall for consistency with engraved scores.
-
- Posts: 2677
- Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 14:25
- Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Re: Very Short Octave Sign Rant
Thanks very much, Schonbergian!
A characteristic seen even in the first uses (with which I am familiar) is that the octave sign extension line is more continuous than the other dashed lines. That is one way in which Finale and Lilypond fail, and in which Dorico might be improved. However, I agree with MaiteM that the Musescore appears too solid so that it begins to compete with the staff lines. Beethoven and Chopin used a solid wavy line ended by a loco rather a vertical. it was therefore easily distinguished from all the other horizontal lines.
And it is no accident that the 8 is large, bold and not easily missed. I think that Lilypond and Musescore both fail on that account.
The idea that complex music is easier to grasp visually if each element is distinguished in some special way is something that may have escaped designers of software who sometimes seem to go off on their own without understanding the reasons for some characteristics of older engraving. Of course, inventing new notation is great if it is an improvement or needed addition; for example the semi-dotted line and ending vertical won out over Beethoven's system because it accomplishes the same result with less fuss and greater accuracy. But to me the changes to the octave sign seen in notational software represents degeneration, rather than improvement.
A characteristic seen even in the first uses (with which I am familiar) is that the octave sign extension line is more continuous than the other dashed lines. That is one way in which Finale and Lilypond fail, and in which Dorico might be improved. However, I agree with MaiteM that the Musescore appears too solid so that it begins to compete with the staff lines. Beethoven and Chopin used a solid wavy line ended by a loco rather a vertical. it was therefore easily distinguished from all the other horizontal lines.
And it is no accident that the 8 is large, bold and not easily missed. I think that Lilypond and Musescore both fail on that account.
The idea that complex music is easier to grasp visually if each element is distinguished in some special way is something that may have escaped designers of software who sometimes seem to go off on their own without understanding the reasons for some characteristics of older engraving. Of course, inventing new notation is great if it is an improvement or needed addition; for example the semi-dotted line and ending vertical won out over Beethoven's system because it accomplishes the same result with less fuss and greater accuracy. But to me the changes to the octave sign seen in notational software represents degeneration, rather than improvement.
M1 Mac mini (OS 12.4), Dorico 5, Finale 25.5, GPO 4, Affinity Publisher 2, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard maestro
Re: Very Short Octave Sign Rant
Unfortunately I can’t show you because that would mean to reset ALL my engraving options to the default — unless I want to do some surgery on the user data xmls for which I don’t have time. But I think it’s 8va. (I hope they’ll make it possible to reset just one option at some point.)John Ruggero wrote: ↑27 Sep 2019, 14:22 Florian, the Dorico is excellent and has a nice vertical, but what does the default look like?
Yes, and I agree with your assessment. However, in such cases the Dorico developers usually respond that it is very easy create your own defaults — which it is indeed. Don’t get me wrong: I think our ideas of beautiful and correct octave lines are very similar. But keep in mind that Dorico is (also but) not exclusively targeted at engravers of highbrow classical music. There may be other conventions in other genres and it’s impossible to make everyone happy with the defaults.The point of the thread is that the defaults, as kindly shown above by MaiteM and the comments by Schonbergian and OCTO. make one wonder if the designers ever looked at engraved music when it comes to octave signs. And examples at the Dorico forum make me wonder about Dorico as well.
Not for the standard octave line, I think. That’s why I ended up designing my own smart lines for this.I think I now prefer the dashed vertical and will definitely change that if it is possible in Finale.
Yours is beautiful — except for the hook. I might lift the line a little bit so it attaches at the rightmost point of the 8, but that’s just a matter of taste.
That, too, is very easy. I’m kind of torn between dots and very short dashes for the lines. Dashes would certainly look more continuous.A characteristic seen even in the first uses (with which I am familiar) is that the octave sign extension line is more continuous than the other dashed lines. That is one way in which Finale and Lilypond fail, and in which Dorico might be improved.
-
- Posts: 2677
- Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 14:25
- Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Re: Very Short Octave Sign Rant
Sorry, Florian, the Finale default file concept is so ingrained in my thinking. But I can look at the Dorico board for examples.
I am not sure that these octave signs meet anyone's conventions; they look more home-grown to me.
Thank you very much, Florian.Maybe I should leave well enough alone then except for the hook. I didn't understand "Not for the standard octave line." When I said "dashed vertical" I meant the hook. All the examples in my OP have a dashed hook to end, which is more in keeping with the rest of the line and allows the hook to be extended downward when necessary and also for sudden changes in elevation. I think you are right about the attachment. It could be a little higher.Florian wrote: ↑28 Sep 2019, 08:19 I think I now prefer the dashed vertical and will definitely change that if it is possible in Finale.
Not for the standard octave line, I think. That’s why I ended up designing my own smart lines for this.
Yours is beautiful — except for the hook. I might lift the line a little bit so it attaches at the rightmost point of the 8, but that’s just a matter of taste.
M1 Mac mini (OS 12.4), Dorico 5, Finale 25.5, GPO 4, Affinity Publisher 2, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard maestro