I'm almost finished with a new font for Roman numeral and functional analysis. I call it MusAnalysis. The idea is to be able to type everything into Dorico or Finale or Sibelius, without needing to export to Illustrator.
MusAnalysis will be released soon (for free).
My question: what principles do you think are important for the aesthetics of things like analysis? What makes it beautiful (or ugly)? Is there anything from this example you would change?
John Ruggero wrote: ↑01 May 2021, 02:14
It's a pretty typical example from Schenker's Der Freie Satz.
Indeed. It’s been 20 years since Schenker for me!
As of this evening, everything in this excerpt is easily achievable in MusAnalysis (except for the funky beams and such... those you have to work out yourself). Thanks.
Wonderful work!
Questions: is it possible to add (use) all Latin letters? Also, possible to use all super/subscripts? Possible to use symbols under the main symbol?
Freelance Composer. Self-Publisher. Finale 27.5 • Sibelius 2024.3• MuseScore 4+ • Logic Pro X+ • Ableton Live 11+ • Digital Performer 11 /// MacOS Monterey (secondary in use systems: Fedora 35, Windows 10)
All Latin letters are possible, yes. The b I had assigned to the flat symbol (since that’s the most common use), but @b returns the Latin b. Oh, and “n” is natural... I need to adjust that as well...
Unfortunately superscript and subscript are not unlimited, because Dorico does not support full OpenType features, so I have to use contextual alternates and ligatures only. Can you give me an idea of what you would want?
You can put symbols underneath, somewhat. I think the best solution here would be to add a separate line of text (or lyrics), a d then shift it so it appears superimposed. There get to be too many combinations, and the resulting keystrokes become complicated.