An interesting case of unusual stem direction occurs in the autograph of the middle section of Chopin's Etude op 10 no. 3. Chopin makes two of the beamed pairs stand out from the others by suddenly changing stem direction in both hands and adding a staccato wedge over the second note. I have starred these in the illustration:
Yet, the first edition made this passage uniform, as do later editions:
Would Chopin have canceled a notation that is so helpful in understanding the phrasing? Would he have omitted the staccato wedges?
Whatever the answer, I find the original version best, especially since this passage is often played only as a brilliant display and without much expressive nuance in contradiction with the style of the piece.
Composers vs Engravers: Stems and Slurs part 7
-
- Posts: 2677
- Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 14:25
- Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Composers vs Engravers: Stems and Slurs part 7
M1 Mac mini (OS 12.4), Dorico 5, Finale 25.5, GPO 4, Affinity Publisher 2, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard maestro
Re: Composers vs Engravers: Stems and Slurs part 7
Agree.
Chopin is definitely extremely aware of all notation issues in his music. These details should not be overlooked.
Freelance Composer. Self-Publisher.
Finale 27.5 • Sibelius 2024.3• MuseScore 4+ • Logic Pro X+ • Ableton Live 11+ • Digital Performer 11 /// MacOS Monterey (secondary in use systems: Fedora 35, Windows 10)
Finale 27.5 • Sibelius 2024.3• MuseScore 4+ • Logic Pro X+ • Ableton Live 11+ • Digital Performer 11 /// MacOS Monterey (secondary in use systems: Fedora 35, Windows 10)
-
- Posts: 2677
- Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 14:25
- Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Re: Composers vs Engravers: Stems and Slurs part 7
Thanks, OCTO.
M1 Mac mini (OS 12.4), Dorico 5, Finale 25.5, GPO 4, Affinity Publisher 2, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard maestro