Hi again all,
Which is the best version? (RH and LH are both up the octave for the first beamful of notes).
I am thinking example 2 is correct as per Gould on page 324...
example 1:
or example 2:
Thank you very much for any suggestions,
cheerio,
HP.
Ottava usage
-
- Posts: 2675
- Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 14:25
- Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Re: Ottava usage
Despite what Gould says, example 1 is what pianists are accustomed to in a case like this which is not ambiguous. Check out http://vmirror.imslp.org/files/imglnks/ ... Demets.pdf toward the end and http://vmirror.imslp.org/files/imglnks/ ... _deste.pdf
(OT Maybe even a sloping octave line in your case.)
Here is an example similar to yours from Ravel Ondine: But there is nothing wrong with the second way. It can be used in all cases and leaves no room for doubt
(OT Maybe even a sloping octave line in your case.)
Here is an example similar to yours from Ravel Ondine: But there is nothing wrong with the second way. It can be used in all cases and leaves no room for doubt
M1 Mac mini (OS 12.4), Dorico 5, Finale 25.5, GPO 4, Affinity Publisher 2, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard maestro
Re: Ottava usage
I find that the diagonal 8va in the Ravel example definitely removes any doubt as to the desired effect.
To my eye, the OP's 1st example the 8va line is too far from the notes it affects in the lower staff.
To my eye, the OP's 1st example the 8va line is too far from the notes it affects in the lower staff.
-
- Posts: 2675
- Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 14:25
- Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Re: Ottava usage
I agree.The end points of an octave line should never be so far from the notes they apply to, similarly to pedal indications.
Here are two contrasting examples from the sources I cited above. In the Ravel the octave sign applies to both hands. This is only completely clear at the point were the octave sign stops (see the arrow), because the initial 8 is not clearly positioned over the initial left hand chord (see the oval) In the Liszt the position of the 8 starting with the right hand shows that the octave sign apples to the right hand hand only: Gould's point is well taken in that it should be immediately clear as to what register to play. One shouldn't have to judge each case by context.
However, I think that the single octave sign is OK for short groups as in the OP where it is completely clear what is wanted.
Here are two contrasting examples from the sources I cited above. In the Ravel the octave sign applies to both hands. This is only completely clear at the point were the octave sign stops (see the arrow), because the initial 8 is not clearly positioned over the initial left hand chord (see the oval) In the Liszt the position of the 8 starting with the right hand shows that the octave sign apples to the right hand hand only: Gould's point is well taken in that it should be immediately clear as to what register to play. One shouldn't have to judge each case by context.
However, I think that the single octave sign is OK for short groups as in the OP where it is completely clear what is wanted.
M1 Mac mini (OS 12.4), Dorico 5, Finale 25.5, GPO 4, Affinity Publisher 2, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard maestro
-
- Posts: 2675
- Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 14:25
- Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Re: Ottava usage
I can't help bringing up a case of an octave line in Beethoven's op. 106 that has provoked controversy. Does the octave sign apply to the left hand? There is no reason that it should. Yet some editors have thought that the big (and very difficult) jump in the left hand suggests that it should be played an octave higher than written:
But it shouldn't. Beethoven suddenly brings in the left hand to lead into the correct register for the entrance of the right hand in the next measure.
Last edited by John Ruggero on 07 Feb 2023, 03:38, edited 1 time in total.
M1 Mac mini (OS 12.4), Dorico 5, Finale 25.5, GPO 4, Affinity Publisher 2, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard maestro
Re: Ottava usage
I have to say that the Beethoven example could easily have had the left hand written at pitch IF it were meant to be played that octave up. (I mean, the previous iteration of that rising scale IS written at pitch)
So if he really meant the left hand to be one octave up, there was no actual need for an 8va sign, was there.
So if he really meant the left hand to be one octave up, there was no actual need for an 8va sign, was there.
-
- Posts: 100
- Joined: 17 Oct 2021, 23:15
Re: Ottava usage
Thanks, John and Michel. The examples are great and much appreciated!
Cheerio, Hector.
Cheerio, Hector.
-
- Posts: 2675
- Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 14:25
- Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Re: Ottava usage
Exactly. Yet the famous Beethoven exponent Artur Schnabel, who was a literalist almost to a fault when it came to many aspects of Beethoven's piano sonatas, was so sure that it should be played up an octave that he wrote the passage up an octave in his well-known edition just as you describe, without even a footnote of warning:MichelRE wrote: ↑06 Feb 2023, 21:16 I have to say that the Beethoven example could easily have had the left hand written at pitch IF it were meant to be played that octave up. (I mean, the previous iteration of that rising scale IS written at pitch)
So if he really meant the left hand to be one octave up, there was no actual need for an 8va sign, was there.
Here is the passage in the first English edition. It is also like this in the first German edition: It is clear that Schnabel understood the final left hand scale as only needed reinforcement for the right hand in a weak high register, not that the left hand also prepares for the register of the following F

M1 Mac mini (OS 12.4), Dorico 5, Finale 25.5, GPO 4, Affinity Publisher 2, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard maestro