Secondary Beaming Angles Question

[Hector Pascal]

Hi all,

In this example, I am wondering about the wedges indicated by the arrows .... Can they be ignored? Or is there a way to manage them? I'm using a two-space beam angle. If anyone has a tip, let me know!

Screen Shot 2023-04-22 at 3.27.24 pm.png (595.04 KiB) Viewed 15479 times

All best wishes,
HP.

[NeeraWM]

When there are 3 beams or more, it is close to impossible to avoid them, unless you greatly reduce the beam angle.
In this case I believe these wedges are the lesser evil you need to accept living with!

[Hector Pascal]

Hi NeeraWM, thank you very much for the reply It is helpful to get your opinion! Yes, I think I will try to live with the lesser evil!
Wishing you well,
Cheerio,
Hector.

[John Ruggero]

You could to omit the connecting beams. Alternating hand passages of this type often forgo those. Then you can position the other beams to avoid the triangles. Triangles on top are maybe worse (?) than having them on the bottom.

[Hector Pascal]

Thanks very much, John, I'll give it a whirl
Cheerio,
Hector.