Hi all,
In this example, I am wondering about the wedges indicated by the arrows .... Can they be ignored? Or is there a way to manage them? I'm using a two-space beam angle. If anyone has a tip, let me know!
All best wishes,
HP.
Secondary Beaming Angles Question
Re: Secondary Beaming Angles Question
When there are 3 beams or more, it is close to impossible to avoid them, unless you greatly reduce the beam angle.
In this case I believe these wedges are the lesser evil you need to accept living with!
In this case I believe these wedges are the lesser evil you need to accept living with!
-
- Posts: 94
- Joined: 17 Oct 2021, 23:15
Re: Secondary Beaming Angles Question
Hi NeeraWM, thank you very much for the reply
It is helpful to get your opinion! Yes, I think I will try to live with the lesser evil!
Wishing you well,
Cheerio,
Hector.
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
Wishing you well,
Cheerio,
Hector.
- John Ruggero
- Posts: 2474
- Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 14:25
- Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Re: Secondary Beaming Angles Question
You could to omit the connecting beams. Alternating hand passages of this type often forgo those. Then you can position the other beams to avoid the triangles. Triangles on top are maybe worse (?) than having them on the bottom.
M1 Mac mini (OS 12.4), Dorico, Finale 25.5, GPO 4, Affinity Publisher 2, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard maestro
http://www.cantilenapress.com
http://www.cantilenapress.com
-
- Posts: 94
- Joined: 17 Oct 2021, 23:15
Re: Secondary Beaming Angles Question
Thanks very much, John, I'll give it a whirl ![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
Cheerio,
Hector.
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
Cheerio,
Hector.