Schneider wrote:17 Nov 2018, 13:55
Two things I've noticed:
- page 1, 5th system, 2nd voice, mes.6, last D, the dot is missing;
Interesting, the dot is hidden behind the notehead. I am unable to select it... I will see what can be done.

- screenshot.2018-11-18.jpg (12.59 KiB) Viewed 40326 times
EDIT: I have fixed it. A nice thing in Musescore: you select a note and than there are additional options what else ONLY you want to select:

- screenshot.2018-11-18 (1).jpg (18.31 KiB) Viewed 40326 times
With selected "Dot" I could edit its many values, unfortunately not "size":

- screenshot.2018-11-18 (2).jpg (34.24 KiB) Viewed 40326 times
Schneider wrote:17 Nov 2018, 13:55
- the page number (page "2" ) is on the wrong side.
Cheers,
Pierre
Yes, the layout I will do the last. Perhaps even not in MuseScore.
=============================
John Ruggero wrote: ↑18 Nov 2018, 04:16
OCTO, I was able to draw this using the line tool in Finale without "very large lines above the staff." Of course if you change the measure width, you will have to adjust the lines, which is annoying. Does the zig-zag that you created in Inkscape automatically adjust to changes to the measure length in MuseScore?
The lines I have created in Inkscape are just pure vector lines with some width. After doing that, it is impossible to go back to MuseScore for further editing, since Inkscape is a vector graphic editor, and I edit PDF file.
Yes, if the measure width is changed all lines are misplaced again.
"very large lines above the staff" are the way how MuseScore creates a line.
===================
Schneider wrote: ↑17 Nov 2018, 11:43
(see: [...] Plus, at time 3/4 first beats, the beam slope looks a little strange. [...] Muscore default settings? [...])
Yes, I have edited the slope. In Musescore it is very far away. Perhaps I can work more to edit it to look better, but there is no a strict rule except some cases. Do you think it should be "flat"? For my taste it should not.
This is MS default:

- screenshot.2018-11-18 (4).jpg (99.72 KiB) Viewed 40325 times
and this how I would like to have:

- screenshot.2018-11-18 (5).jpg (99.34 KiB) Viewed 40325 times
Schneider wrote: ↑17 Nov 2018, 11:43Anyway, in my coding the zig-zags are simple glissandi with special settings (thickness, minimum length, left and right padding, added arrow)
I have tried to do the same that way, but it was very unstable. Was it difficult to do it in LP?
Schneider wrote: ↑17 Nov 2018, 11:43PS. [OT] I'm no violonist; may I ask you the meaning of "P" and "PE"?
It will be explained in the preface. P - I use for short version of "sul ponticello" and PE for "sul ponticello estremamente". It would take to much space, and this way it is very easy to see and to remember. It worked good in my previous pieces.